Question
Question: How is the ruling for common believers who fast and break the fast with the people, without investigation or scrutiny—and likewise in their standing at ʿArafah? Is that sufficient for them with Allah absolutely, or is it not sufficient unless it later becomes clear that they were correct? Must they afterwards ascertain whether they were right or not?
Answer
Answer—and Allah is the One who grants success: The jurists of the madhhab have said: the madhhab of the layperson is the madhhab of whichever mujtahid he has agreed with, if he entered the matter believing in its correctness.
On that basis, some mujtahids held that: the fast is the day on which the people fast; the breaking of the fast is the day on which the people break the fast; and ʿArafah is the day on which the people stand at ʿArafah. They adduced a ḥadīth narrated to that effect. Thus the layperson who fasts, breaks the fast, and stands with the people—without investigation or scrutiny—has agreed with the view of some mujtahids; what he has done is therefore judged valid and sufficient.
He is not required thereafter to look into whether he was right or not; there is no basis for obligating him to investigate after we have already ruled the act valid—except that, if it becomes certain to him that he erred in fasting or breaking the fast, then he must act in accordance with what has become certain to him. As for the standing at ʿArafah, that cannot be corrected except in some cases—namely, if it becomes certain to him that he stood on the eighth day while there still remains some of the ninth day in which he can stand; then it is obligatory for him to stand.
Source : Min Thimār al-ʿIlm wa al-Ḥikmah vol.1
- Website categories